I feel that there is now mathematical proof of my PBMP.
[Power Broker Mountain Project]
While math is not my discipline, it is only a tool of a mental process in dealing with the physical world.
As I have been so bold to note the 3 words preceding in bold, what follows is everthing else.
In fact the fourth point is the riddle itself. The point, the process, the structure and the dynamics?
Everything is give and take, the rest is the result and the reason. I don't know where that came from, but where are we going?
Is it any wonder that there are 3 branches of government, so it is written? Just what is the bottom line? Is not justice the point? And where are the people, not to mention the press and the law?
The Riddle Solved?
The Riddled Foundational Perspective?
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query math riddle. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query math riddle. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, November 12, 2007
Monday, October 01, 2012
Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012
Jolly Roger? October Motif?
R,R,R! Or Simon Says? (Right off the bat...)(*fn)
September(**fn) Archive.
closing 10-1-12 Forward to FOOTNOTES: continue here: FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 ]
NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.
[[]]
10-1-12
IN FACT SCRATCH THIS AS PREFACE OF SORTS.
[EDITOR"S NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 Continued there. ]
10-1-12
[[]]
[]
[10-1-12 preemptive post to month of October.]
(*fn) =footnote on (FOOTNOTES OCTOBER...)
[bat= pun on Halloween and my going right off track with the footnotes protocol]
Not to trickle-down. (Scroll over for Ribble?)
B'log Search(b.s.): jolly + roger ( a, b )
October: Walking the Plank[!]
Motif: (b.s.) PEG'd ( a , b )
(**fn) Still some in draft for September.
(Ribble= ribbing/riddle Hint: a bit of a pin the foot on the pirate.)
[] braketed close of asterisks to Forward.
FLASHNOTE: 10-5-12 http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/presidential-debate-top-7-romney-comments-youd-swear-he-could-never-have-said-but-did/news/2012/10/03/50276NOT! OCTOBER NO SUPRISE!
Nor: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/
First Debate: Zinger Score 2 to -1: (comcast log)"take" etc.
Tough reviews for Jim Lehrer as debate moderator.
Romney barrels out of first debate on offense.
FACT CHECK: Presidential debate missteps.
Obama: Jobs report shows economy is on right track.>?
What the? Ouch* < !
Replacement Refs or Not...
I can't keep up with the debate ball of wax, or FOX-coop and egg heading.
Post Ouch^*:
"spiracy":The Vice President Rolls
"math+godliness": My Respects to Those who Celebrate.
Might be maybe?
10-7-12 <*> "debate" http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/McCain-Romney-wins-first-debate-but-/2287378762/FoxNews/newest/ <*>
R,R,R! Or Simon Says? (Right off the bat...)(*fn)
September(**fn) Archive.
closing 10-1-12 Forward to FOOTNOTES: continue here: FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 ]
NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.
[[]]
10-1-12
IN FACT SCRATCH THIS AS PREFACE OF SORTS.
[EDITOR"S NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 Continued there. ]
10-1-12
[[]]
[]
[10-1-12 preemptive post to month of October.]
(*fn) =footnote on (FOOTNOTES OCTOBER...)
[bat= pun on Halloween and my going right off track with the footnotes protocol]
Not to trickle-down. (Scroll over for Ribble?)
B'log Search(b.s.): jolly + roger ( a, b )
October: Walking the Plank[!]
Motif: (b.s.) PEG'd ( a , b )
(**fn) Still some in draft for September.
(Ribble= ribbing/riddle Hint: a bit of a pin the foot on the pirate.)
[] braketed close of asterisks to Forward.
FLASHNOTE: 10-5-12 http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/presidential-debate-top-7-romney-comments-youd-swear-he-could-never-have-said-but-did/news/2012/10/03/50276NOT! OCTOBER NO SUPRISE!
Nor: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/
First Debate: Zinger Score 2 to -1: (comcast log)"take" etc.
Tough reviews for Jim Lehrer as debate moderator.
Romney barrels out of first debate on offense.
FACT CHECK: Presidential debate missteps.
Obama: Jobs report shows economy is on right track.>?
What the? Ouch* < !
Replacement Refs or Not...
I can't keep up with the debate ball of wax, or FOX-coop and egg heading.
Post Ouch^*:
"spiracy":The Vice President Rolls
"math+godliness": My Respects to Those who Celebrate.
Might be maybe?
10-7-12 <*> "debate" http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/McCain-Romney-wins-first-debate-but-/2287378762/FoxNews/newest/ <*>
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
QCON: TruthOut
Quick Comment On the News or Question Context:
The following pieces deserve a more careful read, but for me, not yet.[*] TruthOut does a filtering of sorts, and I notice rather heavy reliance on the NY Times. Not that that is a bad thing, just not necessarily a liberal thing. The left, right and the middle can characterize a source as from a different perspective, but that should be the mark of good journalism. Again, not that they have hit the right mark, from our own perspectives.
While Super Delegates are an example of a problem that voters wish they could fix without being a part of the process, so are the choices of primary, or caucus, and financing and electoral college procedures. These are all complicated by the nature of our goverment, its three branches, a bi-cameral legislature, and the individual composition of state governments and their rights in relation to the federal government. And have I thrown in partisanship? This is not a civics lesson, but it would be nice if it were in schools.
For me this is the first time in 24 years I have not come out of my precinct caucus a delegate for some candidate. This year it was by design or rather lack of design. I was for Edwards. I ran the caucus as a PCO and was a decimal point or voter or two shy of ending up an uncommitted delegate. This is more than I intended to say today, but I guess it ties in. Because even if civics were in schools, the media and the voters would still have a very big job to understand what mechanisms are operating in each state. Did I mention partisanship? Not to mention the constitution? I won't go there, but too many feel that there is a conspiracy, and there is, only if you are not part of it.
What is represented in the following articles may very well be best efforts to represent reliable pictures, but that is not to say that other perspectives and sources do so well. [*] While some of the tactics candidates use are not appreciated by many, they are apparently working on some. And it must be remembered that we filter as well or poorly as the media or format we use.
I would like to close this comment with the feeling that it is hard to unite when the leader is still unknown, but it is better than being party to having a leader who will unite without knowing who the enemy is. If there is any obtuseness in this, maybe it is a riddle to solve.
In Two Battlegrounds, Voters Say, Not Yet
By Patrick Healy
The New York Times
Ballot Shortages Plague Ohio Election Amid Unusually Heavy Primary Turnout By Ian Urbina
The New York Times
A Clean, Fair Fight
The New York Times | Editorial
McCain Clinches GOP Presidential Nomination By Michael D. Shear and Peter Slevin
The Washington Post
[Update: Just as I put the finishing links on this post, breaking news on Thom Hartmann Show, about the Texas crossovers that Rush Limbaugh encouraged. (Guest David Sirota) Where in the primary, voters got their ballots, and if they were Republican and wanted to vote for Hillary, found that there were no Rebulicans on their ballot. Hmm. Who needs a civics lesson? Well, of course it seems wrong, but parties should be able to decide their candidate not a talk show host who wants a circus. Republicans were disenfranchised, by trying to vote for Hillary while not intending to support her in the general election. They could not vote for Hillary, and hope to influence their own party on local elections too. This "monkey business" is why the parties and the process is so complicated. It is further complicated by the electoral college process not to mention the winner take all nature of that delivery system. Independents and third parties are so hard to fit into this picture without major changes that themselves are so hard to bring about, but I really don't want to go there.(the link not the idea). Oh and that ploy by Rush Limbaugh may have hurt some local candidates and I won't hurt our heads by figuring that out, but it is a way to sort out some math.]
[*] I have yet to fully digest the four links above, but apparently the press have nibbled on some ribs. (Links, sausage, democracy: get it?) But I did scarf this down and indeed have had my own beach party.
The following pieces deserve a more careful read, but for me, not yet.[*] TruthOut does a filtering of sorts, and I notice rather heavy reliance on the NY Times. Not that that is a bad thing, just not necessarily a liberal thing. The left, right and the middle can characterize a source as from a different perspective, but that should be the mark of good journalism. Again, not that they have hit the right mark, from our own perspectives.
While Super Delegates are an example of a problem that voters wish they could fix without being a part of the process, so are the choices of primary, or caucus, and financing and electoral college procedures. These are all complicated by the nature of our goverment, its three branches, a bi-cameral legislature, and the individual composition of state governments and their rights in relation to the federal government. And have I thrown in partisanship? This is not a civics lesson, but it would be nice if it were in schools.
For me this is the first time in 24 years I have not come out of my precinct caucus a delegate for some candidate. This year it was by design or rather lack of design. I was for Edwards. I ran the caucus as a PCO and was a decimal point or voter or two shy of ending up an uncommitted delegate. This is more than I intended to say today, but I guess it ties in. Because even if civics were in schools, the media and the voters would still have a very big job to understand what mechanisms are operating in each state. Did I mention partisanship? Not to mention the constitution? I won't go there, but too many feel that there is a conspiracy, and there is, only if you are not part of it.
What is represented in the following articles may very well be best efforts to represent reliable pictures, but that is not to say that other perspectives and sources do so well. [*] While some of the tactics candidates use are not appreciated by many, they are apparently working on some. And it must be remembered that we filter as well or poorly as the media or format we use.
I would like to close this comment with the feeling that it is hard to unite when the leader is still unknown, but it is better than being party to having a leader who will unite without knowing who the enemy is. If there is any obtuseness in this, maybe it is a riddle to solve.
In Two Battlegrounds, Voters Say, Not Yet
By Patrick Healy
The New York Times
Ballot Shortages Plague Ohio Election Amid Unusually Heavy Primary Turnout By Ian Urbina
The New York Times
A Clean, Fair Fight
The New York Times | Editorial
McCain Clinches GOP Presidential Nomination By Michael D. Shear and Peter Slevin
The Washington Post
[Update: Just as I put the finishing links on this post, breaking news on Thom Hartmann Show, about the Texas crossovers that Rush Limbaugh encouraged. (Guest David Sirota) Where in the primary, voters got their ballots, and if they were Republican and wanted to vote for Hillary, found that there were no Rebulicans on their ballot. Hmm. Who needs a civics lesson? Well, of course it seems wrong, but parties should be able to decide their candidate not a talk show host who wants a circus. Republicans were disenfranchised, by trying to vote for Hillary while not intending to support her in the general election. They could not vote for Hillary, and hope to influence their own party on local elections too. This "monkey business" is why the parties and the process is so complicated. It is further complicated by the electoral college process not to mention the winner take all nature of that delivery system. Independents and third parties are so hard to fit into this picture without major changes that themselves are so hard to bring about, but I really don't want to go there.(the link not the idea). Oh and that ploy by Rush Limbaugh may have hurt some local candidates and I won't hurt our heads by figuring that out, but it is a way to sort out some math.]
[*] I have yet to fully digest the four links above, but apparently the press have nibbled on some ribs. (Links, sausage, democracy: get it?) But I did scarf this down and indeed have had my own beach party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)